Find the right specialist for a job
Who should do this job?
Ask which specialist has done this kind of task best before handing it over, then look them up yourself.
What you get: which specialist has the strongest record for the job you have in mind, how big that record is, and the signed records it rests on.
Ask Quox
Section titled “Ask Quox”Describe the job and ask who has done it best:
If I wanted a security review done, which specialist has the best track record for that kind of task here?
▤ AOCL │ L1 identity complete · allowed · 1ms
▤ AOCL │ L3 policy gate complete · proceed · 7ms
◐ DELEGATION │ router advise ✔ DELEGATION │ router advise │ 1 ranked, 2 sample size, low confidence: true · 5.3s
⛓ AEE │ envelope opened · stream_success
Sentinel has the best record for security reviews here, though the evidence is thin. It is the only specialist with any history on this kind of task. It has completed 2 of 2 delegations with no breaches, reroutes or degrades, and averages about 60 seconds per run. Those two runs are a small sample, so treat the ranking as a weak prior. The record also measures reliability (finishing within budget), not whether the answers were correct. The evidence is two signed routing records, ART_MVCTNJPT_54C81D60B1E9 and ART_MVBUN4H3_3B274B69CEC8. If your review is a formal testing engagement with scope and targets, the security engagement specialists are a better fit than Sentinel. They have no routing history yet, so I can't rank them on track record. Shall I hand Sentinel the review? If so, tell me what it should cover.
17.3s · 1 tool · 0 approvals
quox.✔ Machine verified against the CLI on 19 Oct 2026 · test report mvfta9
Quox asked its delegation router for advice. The router ranks specialists by their past delegations for this kind of task: how many they finished, how many broke a budget or were rerouted, and how long they took. It says when the sample is too small to lean on, and it does not hand the job over until you say so.
Do it yourself
Section titled “Do it yourself”The track-record ranking comes from the delegation router, which you reach by asking Quox. The specialists themselves you can look up directly.
1. List the security specialists
Section titled “1. List the security specialists”quox agent list --family secopsAgent ID Name Family Source Level Status/Plugin Toolsargus ARGUS secops registry 1 plugin:wazuh 33findings_verifier ATTEST-Q secops registry 1 - 16recon_specialist RECON-Q secops registry 1 - 20security_lead DRAGO secops registry 1 - 21sentinel WARDEN secops registry 1 - 31web_specialist PROBE-Q secops registry 1 - 202. Read the one it recommended
Section titled “2. Read the one it recommended”quox agent get sentinelWARDEN────────────────agent_id sentinelname WARDENrole managerlevel 1requires_plugin -family secopsdescription Security watchdog - monitors threats and vulnerabilities.tool_count 31entitled -source registryOther families work the same way: quox agent list --family devops, --family monitoring, --family development and so on.
What just happened
Section titled “What just happened”Quox read the delegation records for this kind of task and ranked the specialists on them. Reading changes nothing, so no approval was needed, and no work was handed to anyone.
Check it yourself
Section titled “Check it yourself”A track record measures reliability, finishing within budget, not whether the answers were right. Two runs is a weak signal, and Quox says so. A specialist with no history is not ranked at all, so a formal security engagement may still suit a specialist the router cannot rank yet.
Reading needs no undo.